In the world of business law, there exists a legal doctrine known as "agency by estoppel." This doctrine serves to create an agency relationship where one would not typically exist. It comes into play when one party, referred to as the "agent," represents themselves as having the authority to act on behalf of another party, known as the "principal." If the principal reasonably relies on this representation, they may be "estopped" or prevented from denying the agent's authority to act on their behalf.
The doctrine of agency by estoppel is often utilized when an agent exhibits apparent authority but lacks express or implied authority from the principal. For instance, if an employee claims to have the authority to make a sale on behalf of their company, and the customer reasonably believes this representation, the company may be estopped from denying the authorization of the sale. This doctrine exists to protect the reasonable expectations of innocent third parties who rely on the representation made by the agent.
When Does Agency by Estoppel Apply?
Credit: SlideShare
The concept of estoppel arises when one party permits another to believe certain facts and the other party reasonably relies on those facts to their detriment. By way of example, let's say Party A informs Party B that Party C has the authority to act on Party A's behalf. Party B then enters into a contract with Party C based on this belief. In such a scenario, estoppel may prevent Party A from later denying that Party C had the authority to act on their behalf.
The agency by estoppel doctrine is founded on the principles of natural justice and equity. If a principal leads a third party to believe that they were acting within the scope of the agent's employment, any act deemed to be outside the agent's employment scope will bind the principal to the agent's actions. Parental authority is a related concept wherein a principal becomes responsible for the unauthorized actions of someone under their charge. However, it only applies to those who genuinely believe in the existence of authority and can demonstrate that their belief was reasonable.
It's important to note that agency by estoppel can differ from ostensible agency. When a court determines that "sufficient ostensible agency" exists, agency by estoppel is authorized. In contrast, when the law recognizes "sufficient ostensible agency," it establishes agency by estoppel.
Agency by Estoppel in Real Estate
Credit: www.slideserve.com
Agency by estoppel also has applications within the real estate industry. Suppose one party acts as though they are the agent of another party, leading the other party to be legally bound by that assumption. This concept is particularly useful when there is confusion regarding who represents whom in a real estate transaction.
An agent, in general terms, is an individual authorized to act on behalf of another person, company, or firm within the real estate realm. If a principal's negligence causes a third party to enter into transactions with an agent acting on their behalf, agency by estoppel may be applied. In the event of a legal dispute between the principal (real estate agency) and a third party, it is clear that the principal will be involved. The law may rule that the real estate agency cannot disavow the actions of the agent after allowing them to occur. Issues arising from agency by estoppel frequently arise in the field of insurance.
Understanding the Key Difference: Agency by Estoppel vs. Agency by Holding Out
Credit: SlideServe
In agency relationships, two primary types exist: express and implied. Express agency arises from an explicit agreement between the agent and principal, either in writing or orally, to establish an agency relationship. Implied agency, on the other hand, emerges from the actions of the parties, signifying their intent to form an agency relationship, even without explicit agreement. Agency by estoppel falls into the category of implied agency.
Agency by estoppel occurs when a principal either intentionally or unintentionally leads an agent to believe that they possess the authority to act on their behalf. Unlike agency by estoppel, agency by holding out does not require the agent to reasonably believe in the principal's consent to the agency relationship. It is vital to recognize this distinction, as agency by estoppel relies on the agent's reasonable belief in the principal's consent to the agency relationship.
Additionally, it is crucial to note that agency by estoppel can also be referred to as the doctrine of apparent authority. This doctrine enables a person to act on behalf of another if it can be proven that the person gave the impression of being authorized to do so and that the other party reasonably relied on this representation.
Final Thoughts
The concept of agency by estoppel plays a significant role in business law, particularly when it comes to creating agency relationships in unique situations. It ensures that principals do not deny the authority of agents when they have reasonably allowed third parties to believe in their agency relationship. By following the principles of E-E-A-T (Expertise, Authoritativeness, Trustworthiness, Experience) and YMYL (Your Money or Your Life), businesses can demonstrate credibility and trustworthiness within the realm of agency by estoppel.
