Real estate news

Agency Duties: The Flipper's Quandary

CEO Khai Intela

Introduction: In the world of real estate, there exists a conflict of interest when a listing broker or agent receives undisclosed benefits for representing a speculator who intends to flip a property. This article dives...

Introduction: In the world of real estate, there exists a conflict of interest when a listing broker or agent receives undisclosed benefits for representing a speculator who intends to flip a property. This article dives into the ethical dilemma faced by these agents and the dire consequences they may face if they fail to prioritize their agency duties.

The Importance of Agency Duties

Flippers, always on the lookout for rising real estate prices, play a significant role in California's housing market. They purchase properties at what they perceive to be cheap prices and wait for the right moment to sell them for a profit. However, when licensed brokers and sales agents engage in flipping properties, a conflict of interest arises. While acting solely on their own behalf, they do not owe any agency duties or have an obligation to disclose their licensing status. But when they represent a flipper as a buyer or become flippers themselves, they must prioritize their fiduciary duties to their sellers.

The Quandary of Withholding Information

Imagine a situation where a broker is employed as a listing agent by a seller. During the course of their work, the broker comes across a speculator who expresses interest in the seller's property. The broker enters into an agreement to represent the speculator as a buyer, but fails to disclose the speculator's intentions to flip the property. This omission becomes a breach of the broker's fiduciary duty to the seller, as the speculator's intentions were a material fact that could have affected the seller's decision on the sales price.

The Broker's Liability

When the broker proceeds to list the property for the speculator immediately after the sale, the seller discovers the broker's involvement and demands compensation for the difference between the sale price and the resale price. The broker argues that he had no obligation to disclose the speculator's intentions. However, the law favors the seller in this scenario. The broker had a fiduciary duty to disclose all material facts that could impact the seller's decision-making process. By failing to do so, the broker becomes liable for the seller's losses.

The Impact of Flippers

The presence of flippers in the real estate market, compounded by market volatility, has significant consequences. This case study exemplifies the detrimental effect of flippers on owner-occupant homeowners. Wealth is siphoned away from those who add value to properties and redirected to speculators who contribute little to the market. Deceptive listing agents who receive double fees further contribute to this issue.

In conclusion, it is crucial for brokers and agents engaged in flipping properties to prioritize their agency duties. By fulfilling their fiduciary obligations and disclosing all material facts, they can maintain trust with their sellers and avoid legal repercussions. The real estate market benefits from transparency and ethics, ensuring a fair and equitable environment for all parties involved.

1